I haven’t read the thing, itself, but I have now read several accounts of Al Gore’s new book, Assault on Reason, wherein he wags fingers at people who watch TV (unless, of course, they’re watching him pimp his book) and the media (particularly those who don’t stick to reporting only his side, of the “manmade” global warming story) and - by all accounts - he trashes the Bush 43 administration from start to finish, enumerating all of Bush’s “lies” and mistakes.
I’ve seen similar lists throughout the web - the collective is circulating it in order to really drill home to everyone who may not yet be fully convinced that George W. Bush is the worst, most evil man ever born from woman (if that is what Barbara Bush may be called) and also the stupidest evil super genius imaginable.
Showing posts with label no crime but punishment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label no crime but punishment. Show all posts
Thursday, May 31, 2007
A Bush supporter's case for chimpeachment
No, it's not what you think. Tons of great links:
Friday, December 08, 2006
McKinney introduces bill to impeach Bush
From AP/Yahoo:
Before you introduce articles of impeachment, wouldn't it be a good idea to have an actual impeachable offense to charge him with?
WASHINGTON - In what was likely her final legislative act in Congress, outgoing Georgia Rep. Cynthia McKinney announced a bill Friday to impeach President Bush.
The legislation has no chance of passing and serves as a symbolic parting shot not only at Bush but also at Democratic leaders. Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has made clear that she will not entertain proposals to sanction Bush and has warned the liberal wing of her party against making political hay of impeachment.
Before you introduce articles of impeachment, wouldn't it be a good idea to have an actual impeachable offense to charge him with?
Labels:
Congress,
George W. Bush,
no crime but punishment,
politics
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
Bush motion fails at Lagunitas School Board
Link
Whatever your opinion of Bush, can we agree that these little morons should focus on their own jobs?
President Bush survived an impeachment hearing this week at a meeting of the Lagunitas School Board.
The board voted 2-1 in favor of impeaching Bush, but Trustee Suzi Giacomini abstained and, according to the rules of order, that equated to a "no" vote, deadlocking the panel.
Trustee Richard Sloan said he would likely bring it back for another vote after a new trustee is appointed to fill an open seat vacated by Kelly O'Conner.
Sloan said the school district needed to take on the issue because board members swear to uphold and protect the Constitution.
"I consider George Bush to be the single worst enemy against our Constitution that we've had in our whole history," he said.
Denise Santa Cruz-Bowman, who voted against the resolution, said the people she represents weren't in favor and many called to remind her the district needs to focus on school issues. She noted nobody showed up to encourage impeachment.
Whatever your opinion of Bush, can we agree that these little morons should focus on their own jobs?
Labels:
George W. Bush,
no crime but punishment
Friday, December 01, 2006
OMG!!!111oneoneone111!!! Chimpy is Indicted!!!111oneoneone111!!!
From Tom Dispatch:
OMG!!!111oneoneone111!!! This means the jig is up!!!! Damn you, Rove!!! You said we'd never be caught!!! Oh, you mean this is a fake indictement? Well, why didn't you say so?
Tomgram: Elizabeth de la Vega, Indicting Bush
Think of it as a Tomdispatch.com milestone. This is now the first website to "indict" the President, the Vice President, and their colleagues for defrauding us into war in Iraq. I put that "indict" in quotes because what follows, as former federal prosecutor Elizabeth de la Vega makes clear in her new book United States v. George W. Bush et al., is "not an actual indictment." It can't be, of course; but consider it the second best thing.
De la Vega has, in her career as a prosecutor, prepared numerous fraud indictments and, as she argued in the first excerpt from her book posted at Tomdispatch earlier this week, "A Fraud Worse than Enron," what George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and their senior officials committed was a crime, not just in the colloquial sense of the word, but in the legal sense too (and not a victimless crime either). While their crime was of a magnitude that puts even Enron, no less run-of-the-mill fraud cases, to shame, it also has all the elements of a typical, small-time scam.
De la Vega's "hypothetical indictment" of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, and Colin Powell that you are about to read remains, unfortunately, in the realm of fantasy. But only for now. Until our world comes more fully to grips with the criminal nature of the Bush administration's acts, you can at least turn to the full de la Vega book. A Tomdispatch.com special project, produced in conjunction with Seven Stories Press, a wonderful independent publisher, it's officially published on December 1st (but available now).
You won't want to miss it. It's superbly done and -- though I hesitate to say it, given the nature of the subject matter -- genuinely enjoyable to read because De la Vega turns out to be as skilled a writer as she is a prosecutor, and applies both her talents to the book. So check out the indictment, read the first day of grand jury testimony (which will be posted at this site on Thursday), and in the meantime get the investigative ball rolling by purchasing the book at Amazon.com or, if you want to give all involved a few extra cents, directly at the Seven Stories website. After all, the excerpts at Tomdispatch can only give you a taste of the full case De la Vega makes. This book should be the political stocking-stuffer of the Holiday season. Tom
The Indictment
United States v. George W. Bush et al.
By Elizabeth de la Vega
Assistant United States Attorney: Good morning, Ladies and Gentlemen. We're here today in the case of United States v. George W. Bush et al. In addition to President Bush, the defendants are Vice President Richard B. Cheney, former National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice -- who's now the Secretary of State, of course -- Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and former Secretary of State Colin Powell.
It's a one-count proposed indictment: Conspiracy to Defraud the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371. I'll explain the law that applies to the case this afternoon, but I'm going to hand out the indictment now, so you'll have some context for that explanation. Take as long as you need to read it, and then feel free to take your lunch break, but please leave your copy of the indictment with the foreperson. We'll meet back at one o'clock.
***
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Criminal No.
Plaintiff, )
) Conspiracy to Defraud
v. ) the United States
)
GEORGE W. BUSH, ) 18 U.S.C. Section 371
RICHARD B. CHENEY, )
CONDOLEEZZA RICE, )
DONALD M. RUMSFELD, and )
COLIN POWELL, )
Defendants )
INDICTMENT
THE GRAND JURY CHARGES:
Introductory Allegations
At times relevant to this Indictment:
1. The primary law of the United States Federal Government was set forth in the U.S. Constitution ("Constitution"), which provides that the first branch of government is the Legislative Branch ("Congress"). Pursuant to Article I, Section 8, Congress has certain powers and obligations regarding oversight of foreign affairs, including the powers to: (1) declare war; (2) raise and support the armed forces; and (3) tax and spend for the common good.
2. Article II of the Constitution establishes the Executive Branch. The Executive Power of the United States is vested in the President, who is also the Commander in Chief of the Armed Services.
3. Defendant GEORGE W. BUSH ("BUSH") has been employed as President of the United States since January 20, 2001. On that day, BUSH took a constitutionally mandated oath to faithfully execute the Office of President and to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. BUSH is also constitutionally obligated to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
4. As Chief Executive, BUSH exercised authority, direction, and control over the entire Executive Branch, which includes the White House, the Office of the Vice President, the Departments of State, Defense, and others, and the National Security Council.
5. Defendant RICHARD B. CHENEY ("CHENEY") has been employed as Vice President of the United States since January 20, 2001.
6. Defendant CONDOLEEZZA RICE ("RICE") was employed as the National Security Adviser from January 2001 to January 2005, when she became Secretary of State, a position she holds as of the date of this indictment. As National Security Adviser, RICE exercised direction, control, and authority over the National Security Council, which coordinates various national security and foreign policy agencies, including the Departments of Defense and State.
7. Defendant DONALD M. RUMSFELD ("RUMSFELD") has been employed as Secretary of Defense since January 2001.
8. Defendant COLIN M. POWELL ("POWELL") was employed as Secretary of State from January 2001 through January of 2005.
9. Before assuming their offices, CHENEY, RICE, RUMSFELD and POWELL took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution.
10. As employees of the Executive Branch, BUSH, CHENEY, RICE, RUMSFELD, and POWELL were governed by Executive Orders 12674 and 12731. These Orders provide that Executive Branch employees hold their positions as a public trust and that the American people have a right to expect that they will fulfill that trust in accordance with certain ethical standards and principles. These include abiding by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as well as not using their offices to further private goals and interests
OMG!!!111oneoneone111!!! This means the jig is up!!!! Damn you, Rove!!! You said we'd never be caught!!! Oh, you mean this is a fake indictement? Well, why didn't you say so?
Thursday, November 30, 2006
December 10, 2006: Human Rights and Chimpeachment Day
From the moonbats at After Downing Street:
Of course. Chimpeachment means nothing without Gimpeachment. And look who the speakers are...
Maybe one of them can come up with an actual crime to base chimpeachment on?
December 10 is Human Rights Day, and this year we're making it Human Rights and Impeachment Day. Slogan: "Putting Impeachment on the Table."
We encourage you to organize a town hall forum or rally on this day for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney.
Of course. Chimpeachment means nothing without Gimpeachment. And look who the speakers are...
David Swanson: Speaking at the event in Santa Barbara
Elizabeth de la Vega: Northern California: elizabethdelavega@verizon.net
Harvey Wasserman: Central Ohio: Windhw@aol.com
Ann Wright: Speaking at the event in Santa Barbara
Cindy Sheehan: Speaking at one of the events in New York City
Dave Lindorff: Philadelphia, New York, New Jersey, or Delaware: dlindorff@mindspring.com
Bob Fertik: Speaking at one of the events in New York City
Tim Carpenter: DC Area: tim@pdamerica.org
John Nichols: Preferably Wisconsin: JNichols@madison.com
Steve Cobble: Preferably Washington DC: cobblesmith@verizon.net
Dennis Loo: California: evening only: ddloo@csupomona.edu
Debra Sweet: Where needed: debra@worldcantwait.org
Bill Durston: California
Peter Phillips: California: peter.phillips@sonoma.edu
Samm Simpson: Florida: samm@sammsimpsonforcongress.com
Larry Everest: San Francisco Bay Area or Los Angeles, Seattle, or Portland (OR): larryeverest@yahoo.com
Parker East: parker.east@gmail.com
Speakers from the Detroit and Michigan National Lawyers Guild: ImpeachBush@michigannlg.org
Jennifer Van Bergen: North Florida: jvb000@earthlink.net
Larry Johnson: DC Area probably best: lcjohnso@ix.netcom.com
Matthew Rothschild: Wisconsin: mattr@progressive.org
Jeeni Criscenzo: San Diego or Riverside County, CA: jeeni@criscenzo.com
Bill Moyer (who is not Bill Moyers): DC Area: bill@backbonecampaign.org
Stuart Hutchison - North Jersey Impeach Group - New Jersey, NYC, southern New York : impeachthem@gmail.com
Norman Solomon: San Francisco Bay Area: norman@accuracy.org
Sue Niederer: Philadelphia, Penn., area: antiwarmom@aol.com
Maybe one of them can come up with an actual crime to base chimpeachment on?
Friday, November 10, 2006
Charges to be sought against Rumsfeld in Germany
Looks like the moonbat wet dream is (somewhat) coming true...
Link.
Link.
A lawsuit in Germany will seek a criminal prosecution of the outgoing Defense Secretary and other U.S. officials for their alleged role in abuses at Abu Ghraib and Gitmo
Just days after his resignation, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is about to face more repercussions for his involvement in the troubled wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. New legal documents, to be filed next week with Germany's top prosecutor, will seek a criminal investigation and prosecution of Rumsfeld, along with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, former CIA director George Tenet and other senior U.S. civilian and military officers, for their alleged roles in abuses committed at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison and at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)